Policy & Impact

Enough Talk

Fix the system, not the girls. Our 2023 submission to the national Diversity in STEM Review, and a call for action backed by investment. Three years on, here’s what happened next.

Girl Geek Academy surveyed over 300 women, men and non-binary folk in tech. Girl Geeks say: enough talk. Time for action.

Download the report
Cover of the Girl Geek Academy Diversity in STEM review submission

Top 5 key findings

  1. 1

    Fix the violence, not the girls

    Girls and women passionate and interested in STEM are squeezed out of learning and industry at all stages of their career.

  2. 2

    Fix the career paths, not the girls

    The STEM career pipeline is designed for men, not women — with no gender lens on career advice and progression at school or in industry.

  3. 3

    Fix the role-modelling, not the girls

    The STEM industry fails to provide effective role models for women, men or non-binary people.

  4. 4

    Fix the funding, not the girls

    Investment in talented girls and women is inadequate and discriminatory — a loss of innovation and economic benefit to Australia.

  5. 5

    Fix the backlash, not the girls

    Being a gender change agent in technology is exhausting and traumatising — and the backlash is real.

The stats tell the story

Girl Geeks’ message to government: we’re sick of talking about it. We want investment to turn things around.

36%

of university STEM enrolments are women

16%

of vocational STEM enrolments are women

23%

of senior management in STEM-qualified industries are women

8%

of STEM CEOs are women

Three years on

What happened next

In June 2023 we said another review would mean more waiting. Here’s what happened after we lodged our submission.

  1. September 2022

    Minister Ed Husic commissions a national Diversity in STEM Review, pitching a more diverse STEM workforce as a $60 billion boost to the economy over 20 years.

  2. Early 2023

    The government holds back new women-in-STEM funding until the review reports. We say so publicly: “We need action, not just another review or consultation.”

  3. May–June 2023

    We survey 302 women, men and non-binary people in tech and lodge Enough Talk, with 16 recommendations.

  4. 13 February 2024

    The review’s final report is published with 11 recommendations. The government says it will consider them.

  5. 5 March 2025

    Days before International Women’s Day and ahead of the federal election, Minister Husic tells the SouthStart conference: “The government is going to accept all the recommendations of that report and make them a reality.”

  6. May 2025

    After the election, Senator Tim Ayres replaces Ed Husic as Minister for Industry and Science.

  7. About six months later

    A spokesperson for Minister Ayres says: “The recommendations of the 2023 review are still under formal consideration by the government.”

  8. November 2025

    The government releases a Statement on the Pathway to Diversity in STEM Review. It doesn’t respond to the recommendations one by one, and it contains no national strategy and no advisory council. The review’s chair, Sally-Ann Williams, calls it comprehensive, but says it lacks “an overarching, whole-of-government long-term strategy.”

  9. August 2026

    The Department of Industry removes the target of 1.2 million tech jobs by 2030 from its performance measures, projecting Australia will fall about 71,000 jobs short.

Promised vs delivered

The review made 11 recommendations. These are the ones closest to what Girl Geeks asked for.

A plan

Not delivered

We asked for (2023)
A National Action Plan to lift diversity in technology, with goals and targets.
The review recommended (2024)
A whole-of-government, long-term strategy, with a dedicated advisory council and resources.
The government’s statement (2025)
No strategy and no advisory council. The words “council”, “advisory” and “whole-of-government” do not appear in the statement.

Funding

Partly

We asked for (2023)
Multiple annual funding streams, and annual, stable funding for women-led programs.
The review recommended (2024)
A suite of diversity programs, including updated Women in STEM initiatives and new programs for under-represented groups.
The government’s statement (2025)
A list of programs, most already running or funded in the 2024–25 Budget or earlier.

Grants and procurement

Partly

We asked for (2023)
Diversity employment targets as a condition of tech subsidies, grants and government contracts.
The review recommended (2024)
Change grant and procurement processes to make STEM workplaces safer and more inclusive.
The government’s statement (2025)
Grant applicants must commit to safety, diversity and inclusion actions. From 2026–27 the government will report how many contracts go to women-owned businesses.

Schools and teachers

Partly

We asked for (2023)
Regular digital technology professional development for teachers.
The review recommended (2024)
Work with states and territories on school STEM participation, and prepare educators to teach diverse students.
The government’s statement (2025)
Teacher Resource Hubs ($34.6 million over four years) and a $2 million expansion of the Girls in STEM Toolkit.

The full list of recommendations and the government’s statement are linked in the sources below.

Where that leaves us

It took more than three years to go from commissioning a review to a government statement, and the statement leaves out the two structural recommendations: a national strategy and an advisory council to drive it. Those are the parts closest to the National Action Plan we asked for in 2023.

Meanwhile the problems haven’t waited. The 1.2 million tech jobs target has been dropped from the department’s performance measures. And in classrooms, technology is compulsory under the Australian Curriculum but treated as optional in many Queensland schools.

Enough talk. Still.

  1. Publish the strategy. A whole-of-government, long-term plan with targets, as the review recommended, and an advisory council to hold it to account.
  2. Fund what already works. Multi-year funding for women-led programs, instead of one-off grants and pilots.
  3. Make tech compulsory in practice. Every student studies Digital Technologies and Design and Technologies in Years 7 and 8, as the curriculum requires.
  4. Report every year. Show publicly what has been done, what it cost and what changed.

Sources

What next?

Read the full submission, explore our case studies, or partner with us to fund the solutions that already work.

Download the PDF